quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2011

Shlomo Sand - An Israeli Stalinist Professor’s War Against Israel

Islamist fascism has a problem. It is that traditional Islam, and the Koran in particular, explicitly acknowledge that the Land of Israel belongs to the Jewish people. The war of Islamofascism against Israel and its population thus directly contradicts the teachings about Jews and Israel found in the Koran itself. The Islamofascists, however, have found a solution to this dilemma. And they are being provided with this “solution” by a notorious Jewish anti-Semite.

Let me explain.

The Koran itself is extraordinarily clear about the status of the Land of Israel in Islam. While in general criticizing Jews for their supposed sinfulness, something the Jewish Bible does quite a lot of also, the Koran relates in Sura 5:21, that Moses (a revered teacher in Islam) tells the Jews to “enter into the Holy Land which Allah has assigned to you.” Moses adds to his people, according the Koran:

“O my people! Remember the bounty of God upon you when He bestowed prophets upon you , and made you kings and gave you that which had not been given to anyone before you amongst the nations. O my people! Enter the Holy Land which God has written for you, and do not turn tail, otherwise you will be losers.”

Elsewhere (Sura 17, 104) the Koran proclaims: “And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: ‘Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd.’” The founder of modern Zionism, Theodore Herzl, could not have said it better.

The legitimacy of Jewish claims to the Land of Israel is repeated in Sura 10:93-94:

“We settled the Children of Israel in a beautiful dwelling-place (Israel)…If thou wert in doubt as to what We have revealed unto thee, then ask those who have been reading the Book from before thee.”

The Koran also explicitly documents the existence of the Jewish Temples on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Sura 17:7 records the destruction of the First Jewish Temple by Babylon and the Second Temple by Rome, and Mohammed never contests the Bible’s claim that the Temples were in Jerusalem. Indeed, the return of the Jews to their homeland after centuries of exile can be seen as the fulfillment of Islamic prophecy. Sura 17:104 of the Koran says: “And we said to the Children of Israel afterwards, ‘Go live into this land (Israel). When the final prophecy comes to pass, we will summon you all in one group.’”

As noted by Prof. Khaleel Mohammed, from the Department of Religious Studies at San Diego State University, the medieval exegetes of the Koran – roughly analogous to the Talmud for Judaism – recognize Israel as belonging to the Jews, as their birthright given to them by God. Two of Islam’s most famous exegetes explained thus: ‘Ibn Kathir said: “That which God has written for you, i.e. that which God has promised to you by the words of your father Israel that it is the inheritance of those among you who believe.” Muhammad al-Shawkani interprets Kataba to mean “that which God has allotted and predestined for you in His primordial knowledge, deeming it as a place of residence for you.”’

From the above, one would think that Islamofascism faces a theological quandary in its attempts at conscripting Islam for a genocidal jihad against Israel and the Jews. But Islamofacsists have invented a solution. They can jihad all they want against Israel and the Jews, Islamic theology notwithstanding, because they claim that the Jews … are not the Jews. If modern Jews are really not Jews at all, then Israel is not a country of Jews, and so Israelis have no rights to sovereignty in their own homeland as promised in the Koran.

So just why are modern Jews not Jews, in the pseudo-theology of the jihadis? Because the Islamofascists are recycling the old mythology about European Jews or “Ashkenazim” being nothing more than converted Khazars. And the new guru of the “Jews-Not-Being-Jews” hoax is none other than Tel Aviv University history professor Shlomo Sand.


To explain this mind-numbing development, let’s take a few steps back. Yes, there was indeed a Kingdom of Turkic peoples living north of the Black Sea in the Dark Ages called the Khazars, and – yes – its ruling family and part of its population did convert to Judaism. The Khazar kingdom was largely destroyed by the expanding Russian kingdom in the tenth century, and anything remaining was destroyed in the Mongol invasions. What actually became of the Jewish Khazars is unknown. Some may have integrated themselves into other Jewish communities in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Eastern Europe.

Later a myth was created about the Khazars being an important component of European Jewry. This myth was to a large extent the invention of the 1976 book, The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler, a writer better known for his lifelong battles against totalitarianism in all its forms. Koestler wrote his book largely in order to create interest and sympathy for Jews and Israel, believing the Khazar story would serve as a basis for respect and fascination with Jewish history. In reality, there is very little evidence of any type, from genetic markers to family and place names, that there is any significant Khazar “blood” among Western or Ashkenazi Jews.

Meanwhile, Koestler’s public relations ploy backfired. In recent years, the Khazar myth has been hijacked by Neo-Nazis and Islamofascists to invent a racialist argument against Jews being entitled to self-determination, independence, or a homeland in the Land of Israel. If Jews are nothing more than converted Khazars, or so goes the argument of the anti-Semitic racialists, then they are foreign interlopers in the Levant and have no right to statehood there.

Now, as a matter of fact, even if the Khazar myth were true, and Ashkenazi Jews were descendent from converted Khazars (and – we repeat – the myth is NOT true!), it still would not make the slightest difference. Jews never defined themselves in genetic or racial terms. They always saw themselves as an ethnic group marked off by religion, tradition, and language. Converts are just as Jewish as are those born to a Jewish mother and just as entitled to participate in Jewish self-determination. And, to top it all off, most Israeli Jews are not even Ashkenazi Jews.

Meanwhile, the popularity of the Khazar myth among anti-Semites represents a return of modern anti-Jewish bigotry to the racialism of the 1930′s and earlier.

Nearly every anti-Semitic and neo-Nazi website denounces Zionists and Israelis as “Khazars.” Web chat lists in which Jews defending Israel are dismissed as “Khazar usurpers” are too numerous to count.

The racialism once again in vogue holds that Jews would only have legitimate claims to the right of self-determination in their homeland if they were appropriately Semitic from a racial point of view. Palestine is part of the Semitic racial lebensraum and those who do not possess the correct pure racial markings have no business being there. Racial purity is suddenly the new basis for national rights.

If we take the racialist argument to its illogical conclusions, Palestinian Arabs have the right to exercise all claims to sovereignty in Israel due to their being true racial Jews, while Zionists are non-Jewish Khazars – racial imposters and usurpers. But to make things even sillier, Arabs themselves are, of course, a mix of racial strains, with a particularly large Caucasian component thanks to Arab intermixing with Spanish and Italian Europeans, Caucasian Berbers, Vandals, Goths, and even some Vikings.

Lest the world dismiss “Khazar Zionist” nonsense as something as pathetic as the conspiracist “911-Truth” form of mental illness, along comes an anti-Semitic pseudo-academic from Tel Aviv University itself to lead the racialist charge against the Israeli “Khazars” and against Jewish self-determination. Professor Shlomo Sand is a hard-core Stalinist and Jewish anti-Semite. He was active for a while in the 1960s and 1970s in a tiny Israeli Maoist splinter named Matzpen. From its ranks emerged an espionage ring of Israeli Jewish and Arab communists, who trained as terrorists in Syria and were jailed by Israel in the 1970s. Writing mainly in French, Sand has built much of his “academic” career on churning out Marxist boilerplate diatribes. He is a fanatic anti-Zionist and makes no attempt to hide his desire to see his own country obliterated.

Sand last year recruited himself to the aid of the Islamists seeking to annihilate Israel. So the Koran says the Land of Israel belongs to the Jews? In that case, Sand himself, a professor at Tel Aviv University, will recycle Neo-Nazi mythology about Israeli Jews being converted Khazar interlopers. The result was Sand’s book, The Invention of the Jewish People, a pseudo-history published in English by Verso Books, a publishing house set up by “New Left Review,” specializing in communist and Bash-Israel “books.”

Sand’s book about Jews being a fraudulent “invention” is amazingly un-original. If submitted as a student paper I suspect it would be rejected as plagiarism of the contents of anti-Jewish web sites. Sand’s book has been hailed as ground-breaking scholarship by Neo-Nazis, jihadists, terrorist web sites, anti-Semites and communists of all stripes. Serious historians have dismissed it as pseudo-academic poppycock, as fraud, and as little more than a comic book recycling of Neo-Nazi myths about Jews being Khazars. Sand’s conclusions from the imaginary “evidence” about the Khazar roots of Israelis resemble those of his jihadi groupies, namely, that Israel has no right to exist and that Jews are not Jews at all, certainly not any sort of a people. Tel Aviv University has won for itself the dubious honor of serving as home base for arguably the world’s worst “academic” anti-Semite, and has raised questions all over the globe about the academic standards it has obviously abandoned.

Meanwhile, we have grown accustomed in our 21st century to the bizarre collaboration between Islamist fundamentalists and far-leftists. Even so, one cannot help marvelling at the spectacle of an Israeli Stalinist professor devoting himself so passionately to prolierating the myths required by Islamofascist fundamentalists, and by so doing grant them the means for ignoring the Koran itself.

sexta-feira, 11 de novembro de 2011

تاريخ النكبة الفلسطينية وحرب 1948 الكامل

فصل الأول – مشكلة "اللاجئون الفلسطينيون" – من المسؤول؟
الحلقة الأولى: قرار التقسيم وتهديد العرب
الحلقة الثانية: اضطهاد اليهود في عقر دارهم
الحلقة الثالثة: العرب يحملون وزر قرارهم في اعلان الحرب ونتائجها
الحلقة الرابعة: حقيقة الأحداث وماهية “النكبة”

فصل الثاني – مدينة حيفا خير مثال
الحلقة الاولى: ترددات ” الدعاية” العربية
الحلقة الثانية: الوثائق تقضح الكذب والادعاءات الحلقة الثانية
الحلقة الثالثة: “النكبة” صناعة عربية بامتياز
الحلقة الرابعة: محاولات لتعديل قرار العرب في الرحيل

فصل الثالث – كم من الزمن عاش " الفلسطينيون" في ارض إسرائيل التاريخية؟
الحلقة الاولى: تفصيل كلمة “لاجئ” على مقاس الفلسطيني الحلقة الاولى
الحلقة الثانية: العرب وفرض “الاجئين”
الحلقة الثالثة: حقيقة ارقام عدد الاجئين
الحلقة الرابعة: أرض اسرائيل كانت خالية من السكان
الحلقة الخامسة: العرب مهاجرون

فصل الرابع – النكبة المغيبة
الحلقة الاولى: تجاهل النكبات اليهودية
الحلقة الثانية: نكبة اليهود في الدول العربية
الحلقة الثالثة: المحطات الدموية لليهود في الدول العربية
الحلقة الرابعة: لغة الأرقام تعكس الحقائق

فصل الخامس – علاقة الحركة القومية الفلسطينية بالنازية ومسؤولياتها عن مقتل مئات الالاف من اليهود
الحلقة الاولى: النازيون العرب
الحلقة الثانية: نتائج “الثورة العربية الكبري” (1936)

terça-feira, 18 de outubro de 2011

Libertação do soldado custou a Israel muitas lágrimas e sangue. Vejam as histórias dessas duas terroristas orgulhosas de seus crimes bárbaros

A Israel custou suor, lágrimas e sangue — muitas lágrimas e muito sangue — a soltura dessa primeira leva de 477 prisioneiros palestinos em troca da libertação do soldado Gilad Shalit, sequestrado pelos terroristas do Hamas em junho de 2006 e deste então mantido em cativeiro.

Amina, a que fez o garoto israelense se apaixonar pela internet para ser morto a tiros, quando era levada ao tribunal que a condenou à prisão perpétua (Foto: "An Nahar")

Para exemplificar o que escrevi acima, vou deixar de lado a enumeração dos assassinos frios, dos terroristas impenitentes e de tantos outros ciminosos que deixaram o duro cárcere israelense em troca do pálido, frágil Shalit, que parece tudo — estudante de filosofia, professor de matemática –, menos soldado, para fixar o foco em duas histórias:

História número um: armadilha mortal do amor

Janeiro de 2001. Ophir Rachum, um garoto tímido de 16 anos de idade de Ashkelon, cidade litorânea 50 quilômetros ao sul de Tel Aviv, desses viciados em internet e que quase não saem de casa, encontra uma parceira num chat. É uma judia recém-emigrada do Marrocos. Trocam mensagens cada vez mais quentes, até que combinam um encontro em Jerusalém. A garota ainda lembra: que ele não se esqueça de trazer camisinhas.

Encontraram-se na principal estação de ônibus de Jerusalém. Pegaram um táxi em direção a Ramallah, a capital da Autoridade Palestina. Perto da cidade, a garota disse que uma amiga os esperava em seu carro. Ophir, feliz da vida, dirigiu-se ao veículo – e lá estavam dois terroristas da milícia Tanzim, que o mataram a tiros.

A “garota marroquina” era na verdade a jornalista palestina Amina Joudah Manssi, de 21 anos, ou Amina Mouna, Amina Mona, Amina Muna, Amana Gouad ou mais meia dúzia de diferentes pseudônimos de que lançava mão na clandestinidade.

Três dias depois, foi presa. Levada a um tribunal, foi condenada à prisão perpétua.

“Estou orgulhosa do que fiz”, dizia, sorrindo, diante do tribunal.

A última mensagem de Ophir encontrada em seu computador dizia:

– Eu te amo.

O pai de Ophir, Shalom, não se conforma até hoje:

– Massacracam meu menino! Foram 28 tiros à queima-roupa! Ela é uma assassina asquerosa. Quando esses animais estiverem de volta às ruas, o terrorismo vai voltar.

Ahlam: rosto angelical, 15 mortos, 140 feridos e nenhum arrependimento. Agora, está livre da prisão perpétua

História número dois: a criminosa de rosto angelical

Agosto de 2001. Ahlam Tamimi, uma jovem palestina de 20 anos, sorriso claro e rosto angelical, estava assistindo a uma palestra em Jerusalém quando recebeu um telefonema. Era de um “chefe de comando” do Hamas que a conhecia e sabia de seu ódio a Israel. Convidou-a para um encontro, porque iria encarregá-la de uma “missão”.

Ahlam deixou a palestra pela metade e foi avistar-se com o homem, que estava acompanhado de um estudante de Jenin, na Cisjordânia – região sob controle da Autoridade Palestina . Chamava-se Izz al-Masri, era filho de um próspero dono de restaurante mas se candidatara a ser “mártir da revolução” e a “encontrar-se com Alá”.

A jovem prontificou-se a cumprir sua parte na “missão”: vestir-se com roupas características de uma israelense, esconder com ela 10 quilos de dinamite e levar al-Masri a um determinado ponto da cidade.

Pouco depois, a “missão” chegava a seu término: numa pizzaria do centro de Jerusalém, repleta de clientes, al-Masri explodiu o próprio corpo, matando 15 pessoas e ferindo 140. Entre os mortos, uma senhora brasileira: Giora Balash, 60 anos, de São Paulo.

Logo detida, julgada e condenada à prisão perpétua, Ahlam repetiu o refrão dos fanáticos palestinos: “Por que tenho que me arrepender? Não fiz nada errado. Não me arrependo”.

The Day of the Swine

This morning at 2:30 AM, was the official start of the "Day of the Swine" -- as 477 murderous Palestinian, Islamic animals are being released from their pens. These swine who have butchered civilian men and women, boys and girls, and tiny infants in the name of Islam and Palestine, these worthless representatives of a fake collective called "Palestine", whose biggest claim to fame is their lack of a positive contribution to the human race, are preparing for a hero's welcome by their fellow animals.

Any Muslim, any Imam, any Muslic cleric who does not hang their head in shame at the release of these butchers -- over a thousand by the end of the exchange deal for kidnapped IDF soldier Gilad Shalit, is also part of the herd of swine.

How do they not weep that this exchange proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the absolute value of a single Jew is worth more than over thousand of their fellow co-religionists? Islamic apologists point of the invention of the "zero" as one of the great contributions of Islam to the world. Today we see over a thousand zeros -- a thousand murderous animals, filthy swine being released, as Palestinians celebrate.

Collectively, they are even too stupid to even realize that this exchange minimizes their own self value.

There will never be peace with the Palestinian people. Any person who cheers this release will never desire peace, will never want peace, and cannot comprehend the concept of peace.

The butchers released today, their mobs of supporters, and every Islamic leader who does not denounce them, will rot in hell for eternity.

Gilad Shalit e o acordo com o Hamas

O soldado Shalit, que nunca matou (Foto: AFP)

O soldado Shalit, que nunca matou




Israel está pagando um preço exorbitante (intolerável para as famílias de vítimas do terror) para trazer de volta o soldado Gilad Shalit, sequestrado pelo grupo terrorista palestino Hamas em 2006. O preço são 1027 prisioneiros palestinos. Entre os libertados, estão militantes com as mãos sujíssimas de sangue (de acordo com Israel, entre os mais de cinco mil presos por razões de segurança, cerca de 70% têm “sangue nas mãos”). Está havendo uma troca, mas cuidado com equivalências entre combatentes. O soldado Shalit, recruta compulsório, nunca matou mulheres e crianças. Nunca matou. Eis a ficha resumida de alguns palestinos inseridos no acordo para a libertação de Shalit:

Hussan Badran: comandante militar do Hamas na Cisjordânia, condenado à prisão perpétua pelo planejamento de vários ataques terroristas, entre eles o atentado suicida na pizzaria Sbarro, em Jerusalém, em agosto de 2001, na qual morreram o brasileiro Giora Balazs, de 68 anos, e outras 14 pessoas.


Abdul al-Aziz Salaha: garoto-propaganda do terror. Entre seus crimes, esteve a participação no linchamento de dois soldados israelenses capturados em 12 de outubro de 2000, uma das imagens definitivas da segunda intifada (insurreição) palestina

Yehya Sinwar: um dos fundadores do braço militar do Hamas, as Brigadas Izzedin al-Qassam. Começou sua vida de assassino executando palestinos suspeitos de colaborar com Israel. Deverá ocupar alto cargo no Hamas, após 23 anos na prisão.

Walid Anajas: condenado a 36 sentenças de prisão perpétua por envolvimento em dois atentados terroristas. Um deles provocou 12 mortes no Moment Cafe, no coração de Jerusalém Ocidental em 2002, perto da sede da presidência israelense. O ataque no auge da intifada é considerado marca registrada do Hamas, motivo de júblilo para os simpatizantes do movimento. Eu espero que motivo de muita tristeza para os leitores.

domingo, 9 de outubro de 2011

Alone in the Muslim World

Leon Panetta visited Israel to warn about its "growing isolation" and he is half right. Right about the isolation and wrong about the growing part.

Israel is isolated in the Middle-East, but its isolation is a constant reality, not a growing phenomenon. It is not isolated because of its policies, as its critics claim, but because its identity is at odds with a region dominated by Arab-Muslims whose national identities is closely tied to ethnicity and religion.

Israel is isolated in the same way that the United States and Canada are isolated among a hemisphere of Latino states or they would be if they paid attention to what was going on south of the border. But the North American anglos have enough land and population to ignore the commonplace hostility of their southern neighbors. Enough breathing room that most in the north are unaware that there is a rivalry in the south.

With its tiny territory, a sizable minority population that is from the regional majority (something that is also becoming an issue in the United States) and nothing in the way of a buffer zone, the isolation is much more extreme for the only non-Muslim and non-Arab state in the Middle-East. But there is one additional factor. Israel's difference is not merely ethnic or racial, it's also religious. And the religion it's surrounded by is a creed which views mass murder as an acceptable solution to religious differences.

If Sunnis and Shiites can't get along with one another, how exactly is Israel expected to overcome a much more fundamental isolation?

Israel will always remain isolated in a region defined by religion and race. There is no way around that and no amount of peace processes and policies will change that. There is a measurable distance between Iran and the rest of the region because it is Persian and Shiite. In the same way there is a distance between Turkey and the rest of the region because it is non-Arab. No matter how much Iran and Turkey get out front to lead the Jihad, they will always be on the outs.

There have only been two defining movements in the region: Pan-Arabism and Pan-Islamism. The protests and revolutions of the Arab Spring have only been a means of advancing the goals of Pan-Arabism and Pan-Islamism. Israel's Jews, like the Kurds, the Persians and the Turks, have no place in a Pan-Arabist region. Unlike all of them, Israel's Jews are completely on the outs in a Pan-Islamist scheme.

If Israel's isolation has grown, it is because the region has shifted further into the Pan-Islamist column after Turkey's Islamist rulers succeeded in bringing down the central pillar of the secular state. There is nothing Israel could do to reverse this isolation except convert en masse to Islam. And even if it that it would be the wrong kind of Islam as far as the Shiites of Iran or the Alawite rulers of Syria are concerned.

While the old British foreign policy hands, bastards though they were, innately understood all this, the Muslim world has successfully framed the conflict in terms of the Palestinian Arabs, whom they keep around as cheap labor and cheap killers. The drumbeat of pressure on Israel to somehow create a Palestinian state as a means of ending its isolation is a wrongheaded conclusion drawn from the cynical propaganda of failed regimes.

Israel cannot end its isolation, because its isolation is the product of regional identity, not policy. Much of the Middle East has backchannels to Israel and carries on covert forms of trade with Israel. At the same time their newspapers and television states attack Israel whenever a ruler needs a convenient scapegoat. Any normalization that happens will be equally impermanent and will be reversed the moment that the situation at home changes. This is what happened in Egypt.

Israel is hated because it is different and it survives because it is powerful. It is powerful because its military is used for external defense, rather than internal repression. This sets it apart from the Muslim world where militaries are used primarily for internal repression.

A Middle Eastern army that becomes strong enough is called a government. Middle Eastern countries that are large enough to field a large army rarely need it as a defense against an invasion and small countries are rarely capable of fielding a competent army because they lack the professionalism and don't see the point. Instead they rely on agreements with larger neighbors that keep them from being gobbled up.

Israel is the exception as a tiny country fielding a large army. It is able to do this because of its level of competence and because its internal stability means that the military does not need to be used for domestic repression, is not at risk of carrying out a coup and does not need to be composed of a ruling minority.

These are very important points and they form the backbone of Israeli exceptionalism. But they are also being eroded.

The drive to negotiate with the terrorists and appease by ethnically cleansing its own population has made Israel very unstable. The left is obsessed with using the military for the domestic repression of the right, while at the same time terrified that the majority of the military will soon be composed of a group that is culturally and theologically opposed to their agenda.

The Israeli military has always been mixed in with the government, and generals easily transition into politicians, but unlike the rest of the region it has never happened at gunpoint. However the left is intent on forcing the military to choose sides in the civil war that they are doing their best to create. The growing polarization is having a negative impact on the viability of the IDF as a fighting force and the Second Lebanon War tragically demonstrated that.

But the primary source of the instability is the pipeline of Muslim pressure on America and Europe, becoming American and European pressure on Israel, which turns into domestic instability at home. Usuing the West as a tool, the Muslim world has managed to destabilize Israel and that threatens its survival as a democracy, and its survival as a democracy threatens the viability of its defenses.

Israel is told to abandon much of its territory and its identity, and wreck its military by turning it against its own citizens in the hopes of normalizing relations with the region. If not, then it will face regional and global isolation. Either you kill yourself or I'll kill you.

It's a neat trap and a devil's bargain because most people will choose to take control of a situation even if it's to their own detriment. Given a choice between chopping off their own hand or being shot in the head, they'll choose the former. Worse yet they'll do it to show how cooperative they're willing to be. And once they've agreed to chop off their hand, then they can't very well argue over a foot or two.

Give your enemy a choice between safe passivity and foolish action on a single open path and you can crush his forces every time. Make the foolish action seem noble and inevitable and you can go home early.

The Muslim world can't maintain stability in its own countries, because its Pan-this and Pan-that which always leave someone one, but it is excellent at destabilizing other countries, at spreading rumor and innuendo, at playing the aggrieved victims, at street theater accompanied by bouts of violence.

As the saner parts of the world are losing their minds and agreeing to commit suicide, they expect Israel to follow suit. To jump into the sea in the name of some greater global harmony. Panetta is only the latest messenger boy toting a big briefcase filled with the same bad news. "You've got to work harder, really put your back into appeasing those terrorists. Throw in Jerusalem, Ariel and whatever else you've got."

But no matter what Israel does it will remain isolated and that's a good thing.

Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East. The only country without leaders for life or freedoms for no one. The only country where you don't lose any rights by being born with XX chromosomes and going to be a different house of worship does not make you an enemy of the state. It's a country bursting with ideas and debates, with technology and creativity and that offers a level of human rights completely foreign to the rest of the region.

Being alone in the Muslim world is not a bad thing morally, though it may be a bad position to be in defensively. That sense of isolation is wearying and dehumanizing, an endless horizon that seems as if it could be bridged with only a little effort. But that is an illusion.

On a map Israel seems isolated, but in truth it is the Muslim world which is isolated. It is the Muslim world that has carved itself up into tiny enclaves, each sect, each people, each street divided against itself. The chaos in Iraq, Syria, Egypt and Libya are a reminder of the internal fragmentation and isolation of the Muslim world. An isolation so pervasive that it cannot be overcome except through temporary alliances against a common foe. An ultimate "Other".

Israel has not been isolated by its choices, but by the cultural failures of its neighbors. As long as its neighbors deal with their own instability through war and tyranny in the name of collective identities that they cannot sustain, that will not change.

quinta-feira, 6 de outubro de 2011

Arson in Galilee Mosque

This past Sunday evening, someone torched a Bedouin Mosque in the Northern Israel town of "Tuba Zanghariya." Someone left behind some graffiti as well, indicating the arson attack was a "price tag" retaliation for the murder of the Palmers by Palestinian terrorists on Erev Rosh HaShana.


“What I can’t understand is why us? Why of all places would they come here?” asked resident Dr. Muhammad al-Haib, in a plaza outside the scorched entryway of the al-Noor mosque.

In a common sentiment expressed Tuesday, al-Haib said the people of the village are “completely Israeli” and see themselves as having a shared fate with their Jewish neighbors in the surrounding towns.

Al-Haib said the villagers celebrate [Israeli] Independence Day and do not identify with the “Nakba,” the Palestinian day that mourns the founding of the State of Israel.

Like others, al-Haib also expressed a sense of bewilderment and surprise at the suspected arson, rather than a desire for revenge.

“When this happened, people were very angry and asked: ‘Why us?’ We’re together, we’re not fighting one another here. We serve together [in the IDF], we live together, we’re very close. Somebody wrote ‘revenge’ on the wall, but why do you want revenge on me?”

Al-Haib, who serves as the Education Ministry’s national director for education in the Beduin sector, described the village as completely cut off from the greater Arab sector in Israel, with the closest Arab villages over half an hour away, much farther than Rosh Pina, only a couple kilometers away. (JPost)

_______________________________________________________________

Tuba is considered a loyal village and its residents have served in the IDF [Israeli Defense Forces] since 1948.


And in an unrelated case
: "Muslim Arrested in Mosque Arson case" / Muslim community member charged in Marietta mosque fire.