Jewish Sages in Islamic Lands Identify the Arabs/Muslims as Israel's Worst Enemies

Moses Maimonides and Bahya ibn Pakuda, Jewish scholars and philosophers in Islamic-ruled lands both asserted that Islam or the nation of Ishmael [=Arabs or Islam] were more hostile and cruel to the Jews than any other nation or religion.

Maimonides [Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon, abbreviated as Rambam; 1135-1204] was born in Spain but had to leave because of Muslim Almohad oppression. He made his way through Morocco to the Land of Israel --then fought over by Crusaders and Muslim Fatimids-- where he lived in `Akko, Jerusalem and Hebron. Because of the difficult situation in Israel, he and his family moved to Egypt where he became a physician, serving as Saladin's doctor. He divided his time between medical practice, Jewish communal affairs [he was nagid, official head of the Jews], and scholarship. Jews in Yemen addressed a query to him about how to respond to the Muslim persecution that they were then undergoing in Yemen. In his famous answer to them, Letter to the Yemenites, he wrote, among other things:

. . . God has exiled us among this fanatic nation which is so clever in increasing our sufferings, persecutes us with its hatred, and oppresses us more than any other. . .
The nation of Ishmael, which harms us and decrees laws against us . . . as never any people did which rose up against Israel, harms us, humiliates us, and hates us so much as they [Ishmael] do. [Yahudiya Masriya [= Bat Yeor], Les Juifs en Egypte (Geneva: Editions de l'Avenir, 1971), pp 24, 71]

Bahya ibn Pakuda [1050?-1120] lived in Spain where he wrote his philosophy. His important work was The Duties of the Heart, which was very widely read among the Yiddish-speaking Jews in Eastern Europe. In accord with Maimonides, he wrote:

The Sons of Ishmael are harsher than the Sons of Esau [= Christians].
[Yahudiya Masriya, p 24, quoted by A.S. Halkin in his edition of Maimonides'Epistle to the Yemenites, New York]

Contrary to what many apologists for the Arabs want us to believe, Jews who actually lived in Islamic states, under the unquestioned control of the laws of dhimma, believed that the Arabs/Muslims were crueler to the Jews and hated them more than the Christians did.

As to Ibn Pakuda's use of Sons of Esau to refer to Christians, here is the reason. Jews under Roman oppression referred to Rome by the code name of Edom, probably due to the rhyme [actually, Rome in Hebrew was Romi, which is close enough]. The Christian world grew out of the Roman empire which it took over after Constantine. Now, Esau is considered the ancestor of Edom in the book of Genesis. Hence, Christians are called sons of Esau.

من أوجد مصطلح الوطن العربي؟

من أوجد مصطلح الوطن العربي؟موقع اسرائيل بالعربية 

الغوص في تاريخ منطقتنا القديم، وتصفح الكتب التي تلخص معالم الزمن ومحطات الشرق الأوسط، والتدقيق في الآثار والتحف الحضارية التي تركها أجدادنا إرثا ننهل منه عظمتهم … لم يتضمنوا أي ذكر أو وجود ” للشعب العربي”.

فأرض النيل (مصر اليوم) مرورا بأرض إسرائيل (دولة إسرائيل وغربي الأردن اليوم)، ومنطقة الشام (سوريا ولبنان اليوم) وصولا إلى بلاد ما بين النهرين (العراق وكردستان اليوم)… لم تشهد يوما دولا عربية كما أنها لم تتعرف على الحضارة العربية البتة.

من هم العرب ?

يحدثنا التاريخ، أن العرب هم سكان البادية المعروفون اليوم بالبدو؛ قبائل الصحراء الرحل الذين يسكنون الخيام ويعيشون على رعي الإبل والماشية ويتنقلون من مكان لآخر طلبا للماء والكلأ معتمدين على تجارة البضائع.

بعد أن توقفوا عن عبادة الأوثان واعتمدوا الإسلام دينا لهم، خرج المسلمون من شبه الجزيرة العربية خلال ما سمي “بالفتح الإسلامي” أو ” الاحتلالات الإسلامية” ( القرن السابع ميلاديا)، هدفا بالهيمنة وقهر شعوب منطقة الشرق، السكان الأصليين، مسيطرين على ممتلكاتهم وارث أجدادهم ليبنوا عليها إمبراطوريتهم الإسلامية ، مغتصبين أراضي حضارات غيرهم.

نجح العرب خلال حكم الأمويين ( ٧٥٠-٦٦١) في احتلال جزءا من الشرق الأوسط ، معتمدين سياسة الاستيطان من خلال استقدام أعداد من المسلمين العرب من شبه الجزيرة العربية موطنهم الأم، وتوطينهم في الشرق الأوسط.

لم يكتب العمر المديد للحكم العربي، إذ أن مهمتهم الاحتلالية التاريخية انتهت على يد احتلالات أخرى؛ الفارسيون والأتراك والسلجوقيون واكورد والمماليك وغيرها من الامبرياليات التي احتلت وسيطرت على أراض من الشرق الأوسط ، شمال إفريقيا وأوروبا.

لتبلغ ذروتها مع حكم الامبريالية التركية – العثمانية التي أخضعت مناطق شاسعة من الشرق الأوسط لسيطرتها لعقود طوال (تفككت نهائيا عام ١٩٢٣).

إيديولوجية “العروبة”

تبلورت فكرة “العروبة” على يد مثقفين من الشرق الأوسط أبناء الأقليات: مسيحيون، علويون وغيرهم من مَن تلقى علومه في الغرب لا سيما في فرنسا، إذ رأى هؤلاء أنه لا بد من فكرة “الهوية المشتركة” بين شعوب وطوائف الشرق الأوسط المتعددة قوامها اللغة العربية ” الفصحى”، التي كانت في تلك الفترة ” لغة ميتة” – يتحدثها فقط رجال الدين الإسلامي وثلة من الأدباء فقط.

هدف المثقفون الأساسي آنذاك كان الحؤول دون العودة إلى وضعية “مواطن درجة ثانية” أي (الذمية) بسبب الاعتبارات الدينية والاثنية في دولة ذات أكثرية إسلامية، كما حصل في حقبة السلطنة العثمانية.

” العروبة” كـ” إيديولوجية سياسية” صُدّرت إلى الشرق الأوسط في القرن العشرين على يد الإمبراطورية البريطانية والفرنسية كأداة فعالة في إسقاط الإمبراطورية العثمانية والسيطرة على الأراضي الواقعة تحت سيطرتها :

سياسة فرنسا وبريطانيا تلخصت آنذاك في أن إقامة حركة قومية “قاعدتها عربية” متعاطفة مع البريطانيين، ستساعد في تفكيك الإمبراطورية العثمانية وتؤدي إلى نفوذ هاشمي- بريطاني – فرنسي على المنطقة، وبالتالي تسهل عليهم السيطرة والتحكم في موارد النفط و نوافذ التجارة البرية والبحرية في الشرق الأوسط.

بدأ البريطانيون وحليفهم الشريف العربي حسين بن علي الهاشمي بتسويق “العروبة” بدءا من عام ١٩١٥، وكان الأخير قد

طالب بإقامة “الدولة العربية الكبرى” بعد انتصار “الحلفاء” على العثمانيين، بمؤازرة بريطانية وبناء على ذلك قدم لهم كل الدعم والمساعدة بالاعتماد على القبائل البدوية التي كانت تحت أمرته.

أوجد البريطانيون وأعوانهم مصطلح ” الوطن العربي” أو “العروبة” وعمدوا إلى تطويره فارضين كذبة أقنعت من اتسم بجهل التاريخ أن الشرق الأوسط هو منطقة “عربية” الأصل وأن سكان المنطقة جميعهم ذو هوية وأصول عربية.

النتائج المرة لهذه “اللعبة” انعكست سلبا على هوية الشعوب الأصلية، إذ قضت على التاريخ الحقيقي لأبناء المنطقة، من خلال حذف وتجاهل هويتهم، لغتهم، وحضارتهم لصالح الهوية العربية البديلة “المخترعة” والمزيفة.

هل بإمكان احد الادعاء أن الفراعنة كانوا ذي أصول عربية، من حيث اللغة والشكل؟

هل كان حمورابي ملك بابل عربيا؟

هل كانت مملكة إسرائيل المتحدة وعلى رأسها الملك سليمان مملكة عربية؟

وهل جاء حيرام ملك صور من جذور عربية؟

أسئلة تفرض نفسها وتقودنا إلى إجابة واضحة وواحدة:لا لا وألف لا

العلم العربي

علم” الثورة العربية” أو “العروبة”، الذي يُستعمل كأساس لرايات أكثرية الدول “العربية” الحديثة، أوجده السياسي البريطاني مارك سايكس عام ١٩١٦، استكمالا لمحاولات الدعاية وإنشاء “الأمة العربية” أو ” شرق أوسط عربي” بهدف تحكيم نفوذهم في المنطقة من خلال “دمى عربية” تخدم المصالح الامبراطورية البريطانية – “الإمبراطورية التي لا تغيب عنها الشمس“. ( The empire on which the sun never sets )

الدبلوماسي البريطاني مارك سايكس (١٨٧٩-١٩١٩) موجد العلم العربي المشترك

لورنس “العرب”

إحدى أهم الشخصيات الرئيسة التي أوجدت وفرضت ” العروبة” في المنطقة، كان ضابط المخابرات البريطاني توماس ادوارد لورانس، حليف الهاشميين.

فبإشرافه دعم البريطانيون ثورة القبائل العربية في الحجاز ضد الإمبراطورية العثمانية في ما عرف آنذاك بالثورة العربية الكبرى. وقد عُرف هذا السياسي بدوره الاساسي في تسويق “الأمة العربية” كأداة لتوطيد المصالح البريطانية في الشرق الأوسط.

ضابط المخابرات البريطاني ادوارد لورانس بزي القبائل العربية- “لورانس العرب”

 لماذا تعتبر إيديولوجية ” العروبة” الإسرائيليين أعداءً لها؟

رمز حزب البعث

تعتبر الأحزاب العربية، التي تأسست على أساس إقامة امة عربية واحدة، كحزب البعث وغيره، أن دولة إسرائيل عدوة غريبة “مجرمة”ولا تقبل وجودها في المنطقة.

هذا العداء للإسرائيليين يحمل أكثر من علامة استفهام، وليس نابعا من اعتبارهم غرباء خصوصا وان اليهود وُجدوا في المنطقة وعلى أرضهم التاريخية قبل أن يسمع العالم بالعرب.

بكل بساطة العداء للإسرائيليين نابع من تمسكهم بهويتهم ولغتهم وحضارتهم المتشبث التاريخ بها من الاف السنين،

واضعين مبدأ الحفاظ على لغتهم العبرية لغة وطنهم الأم، فخورين بالصهيونية الإسرائيلية التي عادت إلى ارض إسرائيل مغلفة الشعب اليهودي ضمن كيان ينتمون إليه ويعبدونه، معارضين المصالح البريطانية و” الهوية العربية” المفروضة عليهم وعلى أرضهم .

داعمو العروبة والأنظمة الفاسدة المنبثقة من عقيدتها، يراودهم أبدا الخوف من فقدان السيطرة على الشعوب الناطقة بالعربية، ومن محاولة التعرف على أصولهم الحقيقية غير العربية وحضارات أجدادهم ومن أن يحذو حذو شعب إسرائيل في نضالهم من اجل الحفاظ على الهوية التاريخية.

فكانت “الهوية العربية” مشروعهم المفبرك، مصورين إسرائيل كعدو امبريالي قاتل غريب في المنطقة تريد القضاء على “عروبة” الشرق الأوسط، معششين الحقد في قلوب شعوبهم تُجاهها حتى لا تنتقل عدوة الحرية والمطالبة بالهوية الأساسية إلى أبناء الحضارات الأصلية للمنطقة.

اليوم، وبعد عقود على العنف، الحقد والحروب باسم العروبة المفبركة، بدأت بوادر الحقيقة تلوح في الأفق وإشعاعاتها تضيء جذور شعوب المنطقة، وبدأت حقيقة هذا المشروع تظهر للعلن، لا سيما وان أدواتها -الأحزاب البعثية- في الدول العربية مارست أبشع أنواع الظلم والاضطهاد بحق شعوبها التي تقول إنها “عربية”.

هوية المرء هي ثروة غالية لا يمكن لأي غريب انتزاعها، وكل من يسمح أو يقبل بفرض لغة، حضارة، إيديولوجية وعادات غريبة عليه يعتبر خائنا لشعبه وتراثه التاريخي.

لقد دفعت المنطقة دماءً لمشروع غريب، وكانت ضحية المصالح الاقتصادية التي تجعل من الإنسانية مجرد لعبة تستخدمها لتحقيق النفوذ. تاريخ الشعوب هو كيانها وحضارتها نبع وجودها، ولا يسعنا في هذا المجال إلا أن نعيد ونكرر الكلمات الخالدة ذات المعاني السامية لقائد جيش الشعب العبري، يغائيل الون، الذي قال قبل اعلان استقلال الدولة : “מי שאין לו עבר, אין לו הווה – ועתידו לוטה ערפל“ ”الشعب الذي لا يحترم تاريخه، لا يحترم حاضره ومستقبله غير مضمون “

Lara Logan and the Obama administration

Lara Logan, the journalist attacked by the mob in Egypt's Tahrir Square while covering the "Arab Spring", accuses the media and the US Government of collusion in lying to the American people about what's happening in Afghanistan.

Maimonides and the “Meshugga” Prophet

(This essay is based upon materials from my forthcoming, “The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism”, 2008, on Prometheus Books.)

December 13th marked the 804^th anniversary of the death of Maimonides (d. 1203, in Cairo), renowned Talmudist, philosopher, astronomer, and physician. The biography of this “second Moses,” is often cited by those who would extol the purported Muslim ecumenism of the high Middle Ages—particularly in “Andalusia,” or Muslim Spain, invariably accompanied by a denunciation of the fanatical intolerance of Christian Western Europe, during the same era.

A particularly egregious example of this genre of loaded comparisons was made by Amartya Sen, the Nobel laureate economist, in his recent book Identity and Violence. Sen has the temerity to proclaim, “…the Jewish Philosopher Maimonides was forced to emigrate from an intolerant Europe in the twelfth century, he found a tolerant refuge in the Arab world.”

Sen’s ahistorical drivel aside, Maimonides (b. 1135, in Cordova) was but thirteen years old (in 1148) when Muslim Cordova fell into the hands of the particularly fanatical Berber Muslim Almohads, who invaded the Iberian peninsula from North Africa. Maimonides and all the dhimmi Jews in Cordova were compelled to choose between Islam and exile. Choosing the latter course, Maimonides and his family for twelve years subsequently led a nomadic life, wandering across Spain. By 1160 they crossed the Mediterranean, and settled at Fez, Morocco (also under Almohad control) where, unknown to the authorities, they hoped to pass as Muslims, while living as crypto-Jews. Maimonides’ dual life, however, became increasingly dangerous as his reputation was steadily growing, and the authorities began to inquire into the religious disposition of this highly gifted young man. He was even charged by an informer with the crime of having relapsed (apostasized) from Islam, and, but for the intercession of the poet and theologian Abu al-‘Arab al Mu’ishah, a Muslim friend, he would have suffered the fate of his colleague Judah ibn Shoshan, who had shortly before been executed on a similar charge. Given these precarious circumstances, Maimonides’ family left Fez, embarking in 1165 to Acre, then to Jerusalem, and on to Fostat (Cairo), where they settled, living once again as dhimmis, albeit under more tolerant Fatimid rule.

The jihad depredations of the Almohads (1130-1232) wreaked enormous destruction on both the Jewish and Christian populations in Spain and North Africa. A contemporary Judeo-Arabic account by Solomon Cohen (which comports with Arab historian Ibn Baydhaq’s sequence of events), from January 1148 C.E, described the Muslim Almohad conquests in North Africa, and Spain, as follows:

Abd al-Mumin…the leader of the Almohads after the death of Muhammad Ibn Tumart the Mahdi …captured Tlemcen [in the Maghreb] and killed all those who were in it, including the Jews, except those who embraced Islam…[In Sijilmasa] One hundred and fifty persons were killed for clinging to their [Jewish] faith…All the cities in the Almoravid [dynastic rulers of North Africa and Spain prior to the Almohads] state were conquered by the Almohads. One hundred thousand persons were killed in Fez on that occasion, and 120,000 in Marrakesh. The Jews in all [Maghreb] localities [conquered]…groaned under the heavy yoke of the Almohads; many had been killed, many others converted; none were able to appear in public as Jews…Large areas between Seville and Tortosa [in Spain] had likewise fallen into Almohad hands.

This devastation—massacre, captivity, and forced conversion—was described by the Jewish chronicler Abraham Ibn Daud, and the poet Abraham Ibn Ezra. Suspicious of the sincerity of the Jewish converts to Islam, Muslim “inquisitors”, i.e., antedating their Christian Spanish counterparts by three centuries, removed the children from such families, placing them in the care of Muslim educators. When Sijilmasa [an oasis town southwest of Fez] was conquered by the Almohads in 1146, the Jews were given the option of conversion or death. While 150 Jews chose martyrdom, others converted to Islam, including the dayyan [rabbi, or assistant rabbi] Joseph b. Amram (who later reverted to Judaism). The town of Dar’a suffered a similar fate. Abraham Ibn Ezra’s moving elegy Ahah Yarad Al Sefarad describes the Almohad destruction of both Spanish (Seville, Cordova, Jaen, Almeria) and North African Jewish communities, including Sijilmasa and Dar’a (along with others in Marrakesh, Fez, Tlemcen, Ceuta, and Meknes).

Ibn Aqnin (d. 1220), a renowned philosopher and commentator, who was born in Barcelona in 1150, fled the Almohad persecutions with his family, also escaping to Fez. Living there as a crypto-Jew, he met Maimonides and recorded his own poignant writings about the sufferings of the Jews under Almohad rule. Ibn Aqnin wrote during the reign of Abu Yusuf al-Mansur (r. 1184-1199), four decades after the onset of the Almohad persecutions in 1140. Thus the Jews forcibly converted to Islam were already third generation Muslims. Despite this, al-Mansur continued to impose restrictions upon them, which Ibn Aqnin chronicles. From his Tibb al-nufus (Therapy of the Soul), Ibn Aqnin, laments:

Our hearts are disquieted and our souls are affrighted at every moment that passes, for we have no security or stability…Past persecutions and former decrees were directed against those who remained faithful to the Law of Israel and kept them tenaciously so that they would even die for the sake of Heaven. In the event that they submitted to their demands, [our enemies] would extol and honor them. . . But in the present persecutions, on the contrary, however much we appear to obey their instructions to embrace their religion and forsake our own, they burden our yoke and render our travail more arduous. . . .Behold the hardships of the apostates of our land who completely abandoned the faith and changed their attire on account of these persecutions. But their conversion has been of no avail to them whatsoever, for they are subjected to the same vexations as those who have remained faithful to their creed. Indeed, even the conversion of their fathers or grandfathers…has been of no advantage to them.

If we were to consider the persecutions that have befallen us in recent years, we would not find anything comparable recorded by our ancestors in their annals. We are made the object of inquisitions; great and small testify against us and judgments are pronounced, the least of which render lawful the spilling of our blood, the confiscation of our property, and the dishonor of our wives.

… the [Muslim] custodians are able to dispose of our young children and their belongings as they see fit. If they were given to an individual who feared Allah, then he would endeavor to educate the children in his religion, for one of their principles is that all children are originally born as Muslims and only their parents bring them up as Jews, Christians, or Magians. Thus, if this individual educates them in [what they state is] their original religion [i.e., Islam] and does not leave the children with those [i.e., the Jews] that will abduct them therefrom, he will obtain a considerable reward from Allah…

… We were prohibited to practice commerce, which is our livelihood, for there is no life without the food to sustain our bodies and clothes to protect them from the heat and cold. The latter can only be obtained through trade for this is their source and cause, without which its effect, namely our existence, would disappear. In so doing their design was to weaken our strong and annihilate our weak…

… Then they imposed upon us distinctive garments…As for the decree enforcing the wearing of long sleeves, its purpose was to make us resemble the inferior state of women, who are without strength. They were intended by their length to make us unsightly, whereas their color was to make us loathsome… The purpose of these distinctive garments is to differentiate us from among them so that we should be recognized in our dealings with them without any doubt, in order that they might treat us with disparagement and humiliation. . . Moreover it allows our blood to be spilled with impunity. For whenever we travel on the wayside from town to town, we are waylaid by robbers and brigands and are murdered secretly at night or killed in broad daylight…

Now, the purpose of the persecution of Ishmael, whether they require us to renounce our religion in public or in private is only to annihilate the faith of Israel and consequently one is bound to accept death rather than commit the slightest sin . . . as did the martyrs of Fez, Sijilmasa, and Dar’a.

Maimonides’ The Epistle to the Jews of Yemen was written in about 1172 in reply to inquiries by Jacob ben Netan’el al-Fayyūmi, who headed the Jewish community in Yemen. At that time, the Jews of Yemen were experiencing a crisis—hardly unfamiliar to Maimonides—as they were being forced to convert to Islam, a campaign launched in about 1165 by ‘Abd-al-Nabī ibn Mahdi. Maimonides provided the Yemenite Jewish communal leader with guidance, and what encouragement he could muster. The Epistle to the Jews of Yemen provides an unflinchingly honest view of what Maimonides thought of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, or “the Madman” as he calls him, and about Islam generally. Maimonides writes:

You write that the rebel leader in Yemen decreed compulsory apostasy for the Jews by forcing the Jewish inhabitants of all the places he had subdued to desert the Jewish religion just as the Berbers had compelled them to do in Maghreb [i.e.Islamic West]. Verily, this news has broken our backs and has astounded and dumbfounded the whole of our community. And rightly so. For these are evil tidings, “and whosoever heareth of them, both his ears tingle (I Samuel 3:11).” Indeed our hearts are weakened, our minds are confused, and the powers of the body wasted because of the dire misfortunes which brought religious persecutions upon us from the two ends of the world, the East and the West, “so that the enemies were in the midst of Israel, some on this side, and some on that side.” (Joshua 8:22).

Maimonides makes clear that the unrelenting persecutions of the Jews by the Muslims is tantamount to forced conversion:

…the continuous persecutions will cause many to drift away from our faith, to have misgivings, or to go astray, because they witnessed our feebleness, and noted the triumph of our adversaries and their dominion over us…

He then notes: “After him arose the Madman who emulated his precursor since he paved the way for him. But he added the further objective of procuring rule and submission, and he invented his well known religion.” Medieval Jewish writers often referred to Muhammad as ha-meshugga, Madman—the Hebrew term, as historian Norman Stillman has observed wryly, being “pregnant with connotations.”

Georges Vajda’s magisterial 1937 essay on the anti-Jewish motifs in the hadith, includes a fascinating discussion from Maimonides Teshuvot Responsa on the question of whether Jews should attempt to teach the Torah to Muslims, versus Christians. Although, in principle the response is negative, i.e., non-Jews were proscribed from formal study of the Torah per se, Maimonides makes this striking distinction between Christians and Muslims, regarding the teaching of the commandments and their explanations, because of the unique threat posed by Muslims due to their doctrinal intolerance:

…it is permitted to teach the commandments and the explanations according to [rabbinic] law to the Christians, but it is prohibited to do likewise for the Muslims. You know, in effect, that according to their belief this Torah is not from heaven and if you teach them something, they will find it contrary to their tradition, because their practices are confused and their opinions bizarre mippnei she-ba’uu la-hem debariim be-ma`asiim [because a mish-mash of various practices and strange, inapplicable statements were received by them.] What [one teaches them] will not convince them of the falseness of their opinions, but they will interpret it according to their erroneous principles and they will oppress us. [F]or this reason…they hate all [non-Muslims] who live among them. It would then just be a stumbling block for the Israelites who, because of their sins, are in captivity among them. On the contrary, the uncircumcised [Christians] admit that the text of the Torah, such as we have it, is intact. They interpret it only in an erroneous way and use it for purposes of the allegorical exegesis that is proper to them Ve-yirmezuu bah ha-remaziim hay-yedu`iim la-hem [They would exchange secret signs known only to them.] If one informs them about the correct interpretation, there is hope that they will return from their error, and even if they do not, there is not stumbling block for Israel, for they do not find in their religious law any contradiction with ours.

Returning to The Epistle to the Jews of Yemen, Maimonides highlights one of the presumptive reasons for Muslim hatred of Jews:

Inasmuch as the Muslims could not find a single proof in the entire Bible nor a reference or possible allusion to their prophet which they could utilize, they were compelled to accuse us saying, “You have altered the text of the Torah, and expunged every trace of the name of Mohammed therefrom.” They could find nothing stronger than this ignominious argument.

Elaborating on the depth of Muslim hatred for the Jews, Maimonides makes a further profound observation regarding the Jewish predilection for denial, a feature that he insists will hasten their destruction:

Remember, my co-religionists, that on account of the vast number of our sins, God has hurled us in the midst of this people, the Arabs, who have persecuted us severely, and passed baneful and discriminatory legislation against us, as Scripture has forewarned us, ‘Our enemies themselves shall judge us’ (Deuteronomy 32:31). Never did a nation molest, degrade, debase and hate us as much as they …. Although we were dishonored by them beyond human endurance, and had to put with their fabrications, yet we behaved like him who is depicted by the inspired writer, “But I am as a deaf man, I hear not, and I am as a dumb man that openeth not his mouth.” (Psalms 38:14). Similarly our sages instructed us to bear the prevarications and preposterousness of Ishmael in silence. They found a cryptic allusion for this attitude in the names of his sons “Mishma, Dumah, and Massa” (Genesis 25:14), which was interpreted to mean, “Listen, be silent, and endure.” (Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, ad locum). We have acquiesced, both old and young, to inure ourselves to humiliation, as Isaiah instructed us “I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that plucked off the hair.” (50:6). All this notwithstanding, we do not escape this continued maltreatment which well nigh crushes us. No matter how much we suffer and elect to remain at peace with them, they stir up strife and sedition, as David predicted, “I am all peace, but when I speak, they are for war.” (Psalms 120:7). If, therefore, we start trouble and claim power from them absurdly and preposterously we certainly give ourselves up to destruction.”

Just over 800 years later, ignoring Maimonides sadly timeless observation about such feckless appeasement of Islamic supremacism—as the Israeli, most notably, and US governments are so wont to do—is truly“Meshugga,” with all the modern and ancient connotations of the expression.

مفتي لبنان الشيخ محمد رشيد قباني للفلسطينين : لم نعد نريدكم ضيوفا فأنتم تجار ومغتصبون

http://www.alnorani.com/news.php?action=view&id=2354

ذكرت مصادر فلسطينية مطلعة بحسب شبكة الاخبار الفلسطينية أن مفتي الجمهورية اللبنانية الشيخ محمد رشيد قباني ( المرجعية الروحية لسعد الحريري ) قد تعرض لوفد فلسطيني كان يزوره يوم السبت الماضي مراجعاً في موضوع تجمع الداعوق للاجئين الفلسطينيين في بيروت.
ولفتت الى انه عندما فوجئ الوفد بصراخ المفتي في وجههم ونعتهم بعبارات نابية وبذيئة حيث قال لهم حرفياً: (انتم "تجار" و"مغتصبون" نحن استضفناكم ولم نعد نريدكم ضيوفا وقال ايضا المفتي انتم "زبالة ولن ننتصر لقضيتكم انا ضدكم وساجرف الداعوق"، وكرر هذا الكلام على مدار ربع ساعة) .
واشارت الى ان المفتي أسمع الوفد الفلسطيني الذي اتى بناء على طلب من اجل وضع المفتي في صورة الادعاءات الكاذبة والمغلوطة, بان الفلسطينين في تجمع الداعوق هم ضمن نطاق التجمع منذ انشائه ولم يحثو اي تغيير عمراني لا بل قد هدمت بعض البيوت في اطراف التجمع لكن المفتي خرج عن طوره واتهم الفلسطينين بالغاصبين والزبالة وبانه سيقف ضدهم وهو ليس حكما بل لديه سيفا وسيقف ضد الفلسطينيني وسيجرف الداعوق ومهما كانت حجم التدخل.
وكان الوفد الذي ضم كل من : سمير ابو عفش امين سر فصائل منظمة التحرير الفلسطينية في بيروت ابو عماد شاتيلا امين سر اللجان الشعبية في منطقة بيروت الحاج احمد كنفاني امين سر اللجان الشعبية... في التجمعات محمد الصادق امين سر لجنة الداعوق محمد كيالي امين سر لجنة سعيد غواش ... التقى المفتي قباني في دار الإفتاء في بيروت .
كما وقد صدر عن قيادة فصائل منظمة التحرير الفلسطينية في بيروت بيانا شرح فيه ماجرى في اللقاء بينهم وبين المفتي قباني وقد أضاف البيان بأن المفتي قال حرفياً: "أنا لست حكماً وأنا عندي سيف وسوف أعتذر من الأستاذ نبية بري ونحن أستضفناكم ولم نعد نريدكم ضيوفاً، أنتم زبالة ولن تنتصر قضيتكم ، أنا ضدكم وسأجرف الداعوق ، وأنا خصمكم وضدكم ولن أسمح لأحد في التدخل

Lincoln's Secretary of State: Jews double any other group and more than all others combined in Jerusalem in 1871

So much for the claim that Jews were intruders in Jerusalem. President Lincoln's Secretary of State, William Seward, visited Jerusalem in 1871 and attended Friday evening services at the Churva synagogue in Jerusalem's Old City. It was at least Seward's second visit to Israel. He first visited here in 1859, and his visit aroused a desire in President Lincoln to visit Israel (Lincoln was assassinated in 1865). Here's an interesting tidbit from Seward's writing about his trip.

June 13, 1871--"Walk about Zion, and go round about her: tell the towers thereof. Mark ye well her bulwarks, consider her palaces; that ye may tell it to the generation following." [Psalms]

We have done so, and we have found it neither a short nor an easy promenade. The city occupies two ridges of a mountain promontory, with the depression or valley between them. The walls of the modern Turkish city have been so contracted with the decrease of the population, as to exclude large portions of the, ancient city. Jerusalem is now divided according to its different classes of population. The Mohammedans are four thousand, and occupy the northeast quarter, including the whole area of the Mosque of Omar. The Jews are eight thousand, and have the southeast quarter. These two quarters overhang the Valley of Jehoshaphat and the brook Kedron. The Armenians number eighteen hundred, and have the southwest quarter; and the other Christians, amounting to twenty-two hundred, have the northwest quarter, which overlooks the Valley of Hinnom.... [Emphasis added. Note the Jewish population was double any other group in the Old City.]

The Jews throughout the world, not merely as pilgrims, but in anticipation of death, come here to be buried, by the side of the graves of their ancestors. As we sat on the deck of our steamer, coming from Alexandria to Jaffa, we remarked a family whom we supposed to be Germans. It consisted of a plainly-dressed man, with a wife who was ill, and two children--one of them an infant in its cradle. The sufferings of the sick woman, and her effort to maintain a cheerful hope, interested us. The husband, seeing this, addressed us in English. Mr. Seward asked if he were an English man. He answered that he was an American Jew, that he had come from New Orleans, and was going to Jerusalem.

We parted with them on the steamer. The day after we reached the Holy City we learned that the poor woman had climbed the mountain with her husband and children, and arrived the day after us. She died immediately, and so achieved the design of her pilgrimage. She was buried in this cemetery [on the Mt. of Olives]. She was a Jewess, and, according to the Jewish interpretation of the prophecies, the Jew that dies in Jerusalem will certainly rise in paradise.

Read the whole thing.

Yasser Arafat was Gay - what a hypocrite!

Category Politics

Yasser Arafat was an active homosexual. If you've never heard this before and you're shocked and incredulous that the PLO chief was cozy with this Muslim taboo... I must wonder - why? Arafat is often described by those familiar with his behavior as a "pathological liar" with an "extraordinary talent for deceiving.

Arafat wasn't "Palestinian" - he was Egyptian. He was only a soldier briefly - but he wore his khaki military costume daily. His headquarters appeared frugal to trick visitors - he had hundreds of millions, maybe billions of embezzled dollars stashed away in foreign bank accounts. He probably wasn't Muslim - KGB cohorts describe him as a "devoted Marxist-Leninist" who utilized religious rituals for "political theater." One example of staged deception was his feigned, televised donation of blood to 9/11 victims - French 2 journalist Charles Enderlin later revealed that no needle was even inserted into Arafat's arm.

Arafat was gay, but he couldn't publicize this to his homophobic, Islamist followers. In 1990, when he was 61 years old, Arafat married the 27-year-old Suha Daoud Tawil, but they seldom lived together - she resided in Paris during the last 4 years of his life. Suha - say many observers - was only Arafat's "beard" - (think Arianna and Michael Huffington) - even their daughter was rumored to be the product of artificial insemination.

Where's the evidence, you ask? Here are three chunks of provocative data, followed by additional tidbits of disturbing rumor:

Bawdy In Bucharest - In the 1987 book "Red Horizon" written by Ion Mihai Pacepa - head of Romanian Intelligence under Nicolae Ceausescu - the author claims that Arafat's bedroom was "bugged" when he visited Bucharest (Arafat was trained by the KGB in the 70's and 80's). Loud sex between Arafat and his blonde Aryan bodyguards was recorded via a microphone monitoring system. The primary eavesdropper - Constantin Munteaunu, a general assigned to the PLO - reported that dominant Arafat "roared like a tiger" while his submissive bodyguards "yelped like hyenas." Munteaunu also compiled an intelligence report stating that Arafat's first homosexual relationship occurred with a teacher, when he was a teenager.

High on the Thigh - In 2000, Yasser Arafat repeatedly rubbed Terry McAuliffe's leg under the table at a Washington dinner party, before kissing him on the lips. McAuliffe, the former Democratic National Committee chairman, reports this in his book, "What A Party! My Life Among Democrats: Presidents, Candidates, Donors, Activists, Alligators and Other Wild Animals."

Queer Death Circumstances - Arafat died in France on November 11, 2007, at the age of 75. There was considerable secrecy about the cause of his demise, but his symptoms included the blotchy skin of Kaposi's sarcoma, severe weight loss, dementia, and a collapse of the immune system - all telltale signs of the AIDS virus. PLO senior advisor Bassam Abu Sharif claimed his ex-boss was poisoned by Mossad with a lethal dose of thallium, but Nabil Shaath, Palestinian Foreign Minister, admitted to Arab News that Arafat's blood was meticulously analyzed by German and French laboratories and no trace of poison was found. USA intelligence analyst John Lottus told ABC news that the CIA was aware, for years, that Arafat had AIDS.

A variety of sources also suggest that Arafat had pedophiliac tendencies - an urge that some say found release in Romania where he was given the services of underage, orphan boys. Another rumor says Arafat's personal driver - a Mossad double agent - located teenage boys to deliver to the PLO leader.

Palestinian supporters who admire Arafat can insist, if they wish, that his bedroom antics were irrelevant. They might claim that his sexuality does not diminish his "noble" work to create Palestinian statehood. Unfortunately (for them) Arafat's closeted gayness highlights his astounding hypocrisy. As Arafat was salaciously enjoying his bodyguards, gays were being horrendously persecuted in the repressive homophobic Islamic region he promoted, with special police squads employed to capture and sadistically torture gay men.

Today, more than six years after Arafat's death, gays are still fleeing the "Palestine" conceived by the fraud who cared more about attaining personal power, than achieving dignity for humans who shared his same-sex orientation.

Who was Arafat anyway? Forensic psychiatrist Michael Welner defines him as the "most successful psychopath terrorist leader in history." If that description is accurate, it will be difficult for biographers to unravel the complex, duplicitous motivations of the man. Psychopaths are often charismatic with the appearance of normal emotions, but in actuality, they are anti-social, immoral creatures devoid of shame or guilt, operating as "intraspecies predators." All too frequently, their neurological maliciousness finds a focus in Anti-Semitism.